Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit ce1448b9 authored by Mladen Ivkovic's avatar Mladen Ivkovic Committed by Matthieu Schaller
Browse files

Prevent overflows in time step calculations with RT

parent b8157dc7
No related branches found
No related tags found
3 merge requests!1887Updating . . .,!1878updating working branch,!1819Prevent overflows in time step calculations with RT
...@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ ...@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
/** /**
* @file src/rt.h * @file src/rt.h
* @brief Branches between the different radiative transfer schemes. * @brief Branches between the different radiative transfer schemes. Also
* contains some globally valid functions related to time bin data.
*/ */
/* Config parameters. */ /* Config parameters. */
...@@ -44,6 +45,19 @@ ...@@ -44,6 +45,19 @@
#error "Invalid choice of radiation scheme" #error "Invalid choice of radiation scheme"
#endif #endif
/**
* @brief Initialise RT time step data. This struct should be hidden from users,
* so we do it for all schemes here.
*
* @param p The #part.
*/
__attribute__((always_inline)) INLINE static void rt_first_init_timestep_data(
struct part *restrict p) {
p->rt_time_data.min_ngb_time_bin = num_time_bins + 1;
p->rt_time_data.time_bin = 0;
}
/** /**
* @brief Prepare the rt *time step* quantities for a *hydro force* calculation. * @brief Prepare the rt *time step* quantities for a *hydro force* calculation.
* *
......
...@@ -740,6 +740,10 @@ void runner_do_timestep(struct runner *r, struct cell *c, const int timer) { ...@@ -740,6 +740,10 @@ void runner_do_timestep(struct runner *r, struct cell *c, const int timer) {
* debugging/consistency check. */ * debugging/consistency check. */
rt_debugging_check_timestep(p, &ti_rt_new_step, &ti_new_step, rt_debugging_check_timestep(p, &ti_rt_new_step, &ti_new_step,
e->max_nr_rt_subcycles, e->time_base); e->max_nr_rt_subcycles, e->time_base);
if (ti_rt_new_step <= 0LL)
error("Got integer time step <= 0? %lld %lld",
get_part_rt_timestep(p, xp, e), ti_new_step);
#endif #endif
/* Update particle */ /* Update particle */
......
...@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ void space_first_init_parts_mapper(void *restrict map_data, int count, ...@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ void space_first_init_parts_mapper(void *restrict map_data, int count,
particle_splitting_mark_part_as_not_split(&xp[k].split_data, p[k].id); particle_splitting_mark_part_as_not_split(&xp[k].split_data, p[k].id);
/* And the radiative transfer */ /* And the radiative transfer */
rt_first_init_timestep_data(&p[k]);
rt_first_init_part(&p[k], cosmo, rt_props); rt_first_init_part(&p[k], cosmo, rt_props);
#ifdef SWIFT_DEBUG_CHECKS #ifdef SWIFT_DEBUG_CHECKS
......
...@@ -218,7 +218,21 @@ __attribute__((always_inline)) INLINE static integertime_t get_part_timestep( ...@@ -218,7 +218,21 @@ __attribute__((always_inline)) INLINE static integertime_t get_part_timestep(
/* enforce dt_hydro <= nsubcycles * dt_rt. The rare case where /* enforce dt_hydro <= nsubcycles * dt_rt. The rare case where
* new_dti_rt > new_dti will be handled in the parent function * new_dti_rt > new_dti will be handled in the parent function
* that calls this one. */ * that calls this one. */
const integertime_t max_subcycles = max(e->max_nr_rt_subcycles, 1); integertime_t max_subcycles = max(e->max_nr_rt_subcycles, 1);
if (max_nr_timesteps / max_subcycles < new_dti_rt) {
/* multiplication new_dti_rt * max_subcycles would overflow. This can
* happen in rare cases, especially if the total physical time the
* simulation should cover is small. So limit max_subcycles to a
* reasonable value.
* First find an integer guess for the maximal permissible number
* of sub-cycles. Then find highest power-of-two below that guess.
* Divide the guess by a factor of 2 to simplify the subsequent while
* loop. The max() is there to prevent bad things happening. */
const integertime_t max_subcycles_guess =
max(1LL, max_nr_timesteps / (new_dti_rt * 2LL));
max_subcycles = 1LL;
while (max_subcycles_guess > max_subcycles) max_subcycles *= 2LL;
}
new_dti = min(new_dti, new_dti_rt * max_subcycles); new_dti = min(new_dti, new_dti_rt * max_subcycles);
} }
} }
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment