Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit c7960649 authored by Josh Borrow's avatar Josh Borrow
Browse files

Added basic theory (equations essentially) behind PUSPH here

parent 5779ee54
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!540Add Pressure-Energy (P-U) SPH
......@@ -377,7 +377,70 @@ itself is \emph{not} updated.
\subsection{Pressure-Energy SPH}
\label{sec:sph:pu}
Section 2.2.2 of \cite{Hopkins2013}.\\ \tbd
Section 2.2.2 of \cite{Hopkins2013} describes the equations for Pressure-Energy
(P-U) SPH; they are reproduced here with some more details.
P-U SPH depends on the calculation of a smoothed pressure, and follows the
evolution of the internal energy, as opposed to the entropy.
For P-U, the following choice of parameters in the formalism of \S
\ref{sec:derivation} provides convenient properties:
\begin{align}
x_i =& (\gamma - 1) m_i u_i~, \\
\tilde{x}_i =& 1,
\label{eq:sph:pu:xichoice}
\end{align}
leading to the following requirements to ensure correct volume elements:
\begin{align}
y_i =& \sum_{j} (\gamma - 1) m_j u_j W_{ij} = \bar{P}_i,\\
\tilde{y}_i =& \sum_{j} W_{ij} = \bar{n}_i, \\
\label{eq:sph:pu:yichoice}
\end{align}
with the resulting variables representing a smoothed pressure and particle
number density. This choice of variables leads to the following equation of
motion:
\begin{align}
\frac{\mathrm{d} \mathbf{v}_i}{\mathrm{d} t} = -\sum_j (\gamma - 1)^2 m_j u_j u_i
&\left[\frac{f_{ij}}{\bar{P}_i} \nabla_i W_{ij}(h_i) ~+ \right. \\
&\frac{f_{ji}}{\bar{P}_j} \nabla_i W_{ji}(h_j) ~+ \\
& \left.\nu_{ij}\bar{\nabla_i W_{ij}}\right]~.
\label{eq:sph:pu:eom}
\end{align}
which includes the Monaghan artificial viscosity term and Balsara switch in
the final term.
The $h$-terms are given as
\begin{align}
f_{ij} = 1 - & \left[\frac{h_i}{n_d (\gamma - 1) \bar{n}_i \left\{m_j u_j\right\}}
\frac{\partial \bar{P}_i}{\partial h_i} \right] \times \\
& \left( 1 + \frac{h_i}{n_d \bar{n}_i} \frac{\partial \bar{n}_i}{\partial h_i} \right)^{-1}
\label{eq:sph:pu:fij}
\end{align}
with $n_d$ the number of dimensions. In practice, the majority of $f_{ij}$ is
precomputed in {\tt hydro\_prepare\_force} as only the curly-bracketed term
depends on the $j$ particle. This cuts out on the majority of operations,
including expensive divisions.
In a similar fashion to \MinimalSPH, the internal energy must also be
evolved. Following \cite{Hopkins2013}, this is calculated as
\begin{align}
\frac{\mathrm{d}u_i}{\mathrm{d}t} = \sum_j (\gamma - 1)^2 m_j u_j u_i
\frac{f_{ij}}{\bar{P}_i}(\mathbf{v}_i - \mathbf{v}_j) \cdot
\nabla_i W_{ij}(h_i)~.
\label{eq:sph:pu:dudt}
\end{align}
\subsubsection{Time integration}
Time integration follows exactly the same scheme as \MinimalSPH.
\subsubsection{Particle properties prediction}
The prediciton of particle properties follows exactly the same scheme as
\MinimalSPH.
\subsection{Anarchy SPH}
Dalla Vecchia (\textit{in prep.}), also described in section 2.2.2 of
\cite{Schaller2015}.\\
......
......@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
\section{Equation of state}
\input{EoS/eos}
\section{Derivation of the Equation of Motion}
\section{Derivation of the Equation of Motion}\label{sec:derivation}
\input{Derivation/sph_derivation.tex}
\section{SPH flavours}
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please register or to comment