From 8f657024f750f61a75b14eb6235797b83d15dbe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pedro Gonnet <gonnet@google.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:27:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fixed up the comments formatting.
---
src/part.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/part.c b/src/part.c
index 94d954d81d..6d49887ad7 100644
--- a/src/part.c
+++ b/src/part.c
@@ -36,12 +36,12 @@
*/
void part_create_mpi_type(MPI_Datatype* part_type) {
- /* This is not the recommended way of doing this. */
- /* One should define the structure field by field */
- /* But as long as we don't do serialization via MPI-IO */
- /* we don't really care. */
- /* Also we would have to modify this function everytime something */
- /* is added to the part structure. */
+ /* This is not the recommended way of doing this.
+ One should define the structure field by field
+ But as long as we don't do serialization via MPI-IO
+ we don't really care.
+ Also we would have to modify this function everytime something
+ is added to the part structure. */
MPI_Type_contiguous(sizeof(struct part) / sizeof(unsigned char), MPI_BYTE,
part_type);
MPI_Type_commit(part_type);
@@ -54,12 +54,12 @@ void part_create_mpi_type(MPI_Datatype* part_type) {
*/
void xpart_create_mpi_type(MPI_Datatype* xpart_type) {
- /* This is not the recommended way of doing this. */
- /* One should define the structure field by field */
- /* But as long as we don't do serialization via MPI-IO */
- /* we don't really care. */
- /* Also we would have to modify this function everytime something */
- /* is added to the part structure. */
+ /* This is not the recommended way of doing this.
+ One should define the structure field by field
+ But as long as we don't do serialization via MPI-IO
+ we don't really care.
+ Also we would have to modify this function everytime something
+ is added to the part structure. */
MPI_Type_contiguous(sizeof(struct xpart) / sizeof(unsigned char), MPI_BYTE,
xpart_type);
MPI_Type_commit(xpart_type);
--
GitLab