From 4e3f3f2db61229e297130994a2d76c4211b994bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Peter W. Draper" <p.w.draper@durham.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 13:30:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Check if the -isystem includes really fix the NUMA prototypes
problem, if not bail out
---
configure.ac | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index a3dd823511..7e5af3bcc2 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1145,6 +1145,18 @@ if test "$have_numa" != "no"; then
case "$CFLAGS" in
*strict-prototypes*)
NUMA_INCS="-isystem$with_numa/include"
+ # This may still fail if CPATH is used, so we check if the
+ # headers are usable.
+ AS_UNSET(ac_cv_header_numa_h)
+ old_CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS"
+ CPPFLAGS="$CPPFLAGS $NUMA_INCS"
+ numa_failed="no"
+ AC_CHECK_HEADER([numa.h],[numa_failed="no"],
+ [numa_failed="yes"])
+ if test "$numa_failed" = "yes"; then
+ AC_MSG_ERROR([Failed to compile the numa.h header file: you may need to set --enable-compiler-warnings to yes or no])
+ fi
+ CPPFLAGS="$old_CPPFLAGS"
;;
*)
NUMA_INCS="-I$with_numa/include"
--
GitLab